Filed under Republicans

For the Love of God, Stop this Man

The GOP has had its moments.  You know, those scary, makes-you-cringe moments.  There was Dan Quayle’s attack on Murphy Brown, Gary Bauer flipping pancakes, and Herman Cain running for President even though he had a closet filled with skeletons.  It makes you shake your head.  What were they thinking?

I yearn for those days.

The GOP now faces a major decision.  To embrace Rick Santorum, or one of the other three candidates.  Santorum continues to surge, quite possibly because he’s deemed by the main stream media (and sometimes even non-main stream sources) as the only viable conservative option in the current field.  He’s currently the anti-Romney.  You know this drill, the media raises a candidate up to challenger status in order to have them compete with Romney.  Bachmann, Gingrich, Perry, Cain, Gingrich (again) all were anointed by the media prior to their ascent to the media’s guillotine.  Santorum is one the same path, except that he’s still being propped up by the media.  The argument has been made that the liberal media is worried about a Romney’s candidacy and Rick looks like a candidate Obama can walk all over in November.  For once, the liberal media is absolutely correct.  Santorum is poison to the GOP, a cancer that will eat away at the current anti-Obama sentiment and redirect that sentiment towards a candidate who is far out of step with the center-right coalition that elects Republican Presidents.

He is the brakes on a surging GOP, which has been fueled by strong anti-Obamacare sentiments, activists upset by the size and scope of this government, and the original Tea Party members who yearn for lower, fairer taxes.  A Santorum candidacy ends all of this and changes the debate from relevant topics to the odd and strange that Santorum has stood for.  These topics include: Satan coming after America, women in the military, gay rights, and contraceptive use to name a few.  Hey, anyone see that unemployment flirts with double digits each month?  Gas prices are through the roof?  In a Santorum-Obama matchup, there will be little discussion of issues that matter in 2012.  Instead the Obama machine will relish in the opportunity to go after Rick’s weak and generally unpopular social stances.  The Chicago machine will paint him as an extremist and we have ourselves a candidate who may be our version of Walter Mondale in 1984.  We lose–badly.

Besides Santorum being a political albatross on the party’s neck, he’s the biggest government candidate left standing in the GOP field.  He’s a big spender (i.e. Congressional pay increases, Bridge to Nowhere), big government advocate (No Child Left Behind), and a tax raiser; his social agenda creates a nanny state that would make Mayor Bloomberg look like Ron Paul.  If you want to see social engineering, Rick’s your guy!

Now is a time for choosing.  Though all are flawed, any of the other three candidates are extremely more acceptable than Rick Santorum.  His nomination destroys any of the current GOP traction, and sets us back light years.  He would created a unfocused party and will splinter the GOP into a number of directions.  We can say goodbye to Reagan Democrats, the middle class, small government conservatives and any serious economic conservatives.  Conservatives need to see this candidate for what he is: an unelectable swelling boil on the GOP.

Are You Better Off Now?

The Democratic Party is trying to dig up all kinds of dirt on GOP candidates across the country.  There is no surprise here, since the Party has become an extension of Chicago-style politics.  The GOP must keep their cool amid these political fishing expeditions and ask voters if they are better off now than two years ago.  Remember two years ago?  All that hope and change?  Where is it?

Van Jones Should Resign

First, he called Republicans “a**holes” now new information shows that President Obama’s “green jobs czar” was/is a 9-11 truther.

By the way according to this same article, Jones considered himself a “communist” during the 1990s.  That probably would have come out in any kind of appointment hearing, however, czars are appointed without any Senate confirmation.

UPDATE: Jones issues a pathetic apology.  Does he take Americans as fools?  He MUST be tossed from the Obama administration–he’s a disgrace.

Coburn Questioning Spending Provisions

Oklahoma SenatorTom Coburn (R) is trying to unearth the lunacy of the spending package rushed through Congress by President Obama.  Highlights are below:

_A Bureau of Land Management project to study the impact wind farms have on the sage grouse population in Oregon. The proposal calls for hiring people to tag sage grouse in areas where wind farms may be built, to help determine where turbines could be located.

_$1.5 million in stimulus money for a $5 million new wastewater treatment plant in Perkins, Okla., his home state. Coburn said the stimulus money came with strings that will increase the costs. With a new total cost of $7.2 million, the city will be forced to borrow money and, as a result, utility taxes have increased by 60 percent this year, the senator said.

_Grants and loans totaling $1.3 million to Solon Township in Leelanau County, Mich., to help pay for construction of a wastewater treatment plant. Local opposition killed the project. The money will now be used for a future treatment plant, for which there is no plan and questionable local support.

_Road signs costing $300 each, being placed at construction sites to alert motorists that the project is being paid for by the stimulus money. Transportation Department spokesman Jill Zuckman said each state decides whether to use stimulus money for signs, and the cost would vary in each state.

_A $3 million project to repair taxiways at Hanscom Field, Mass., which Coburn said is for corporate jets. Richard Walsh, a spokesman for the independent state agency that runs the airport, Massport, said only 18 percent of the traffic at the airport is for corporate jets. Most of the use, 70 percent cent, is for flight students, he said.

_Montana’s state-run liquor warehouse, to receive $2.2 million in stimulus cash to install skylights. The project is part of the $27.7 million the state has been awarded for energy programs.

On Super Tuesday, Why Not Romney

Mitt Romney is not a small government conservative.

When looking at candidates who will be able to carry the mantle of Goldwater and Reagan, you can simply look over Mitt Romney.  Here’s a small smattering of reasons why:

Romney’s health care plan in Taxachusetts was more like socialized medicine, and is costing his state. 

..it is hard to portray yourself as the ideological heir to Ronald Reagan when your health-care plan is virtually indistinguishable from the one proposed by Hillary Clinton.

On President Reagan and the 1980s:

“I was an independent during the time of Reagan/Bush.  I’m not trying to return to Reagan/Bush.” (in his own words at 2:32)

On affirmative action:

“There’s nothing we’re trying to eliminate. We’re only trying to build upon what’s been done in the past with a new, more effective effort in increasing the number and the percentage of people from all backgrounds and ethnic heritages in state government.”

On taxes:

…Romney increased annual state fees by $500 million as governor and proposed two corporate tax increases totaling close to $400 million a year.

On gun control:

Supported assault weapons ban and Brady bill.

Romney has flipped, flopped and flipped again.  The issues he’s gone back and forth on aren’t just small government issues (his stances on abortion and gay rights have gone back and forth).  How can small government conservatives believe that this candidate will support our values?  Based on past practice, I just can’t trust him to do that.

Tagged , , , , ,

Today’s Small Government Heroes

Here’s the list:

President George Bush (I know, please pick yourself off the floor) 

Sen. Tom Coburn

Sen. Jim DeMint

Sen. John McCain

Here’s why:

President Bush is calling out Congressional pork!  Where these great pork-cutting senators are working to clean up the earmark process, to make it more transparent and for legislators to be held accountable, the President is looking at ways to cut earmarks from the omnibus budget bill.  Could this be the beginning of a smaller Bush administration?  Don’t hold your breath.  DeMint, Coburn and McCain are pork hawks and have been fighting against earmarks for years.  This is the first I’ve heard from the President regarding pork, but I like what I hear.   

Huckabee, A Thinner Big Government Republican

Mike Huckabee lures you in with his quick wit and charm.  He’ll mention that he’s anti-abortion and pro-gun ownership.  He’ll even tell you about how he lost over 100 pounds, but he won’t tell you that his not quite as good at cutting fat as an elected official.  In fact, a presidential ticket with Mike Huckabee may continue the longstanding tradition of big government Republicans occupying the Executive Branch.

But, don’t just take my word for it.  Richard Viguerie, author of Conservatives Betrayed, called him a wishy-washy Republican for his economic views.  The Club for Growth’s economic report on Huckabee paints the picture of a taxer and spender.  Authors at the American Spectator and National Review also had some bones to pick with Huckabee.  Even this author pointed out his desire to have a national ban on smoking.

A new poll puts Governor Huckabee in a neck-and-neck race with Mitt Romney in Iowa.   This is dangerous ground for small government conservatives who see that big government GOPers are leading the race in Iowa.  Hopefully, the caucus voters won’t reward their big government ways.

Kinsley on Libertarians

An interesting read of the future of the GOP and what Micheal Kinsley calls “Libertarians”.  Admittedly, he uses broad strokes in his writing and I can’t agree with everything, but it does provide a valid conclusion. 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.